<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Rob Bell An Evangelical?  Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://restlesspilgrim.com/2009/11/is-rob-bell-an-evangelical-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://restlesspilgrim.com/2009/11/is-rob-bell-an-evangelical-part-ii/</link>
	<description>a blog by Christian George</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:54:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bradley Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://restlesspilgrim.com/2009/11/is-rob-bell-an-evangelical-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradley Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://restlesspilgrim.com/?p=1768#comment-533</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Christian, for a synopsis of this important commentator in today&#039;s theological melting pot.  Your &quot;What to do&quot; section actually reflects what I like least about theological discussion with the typical Christian, only in that you address two camps of thought.  Fortunately yours two camps are not &quot;for&quot; and &quot;against.&quot;  When discussing a new theological idea, I often sense the listener targeting what he can verbally disagree with rather than what could potentially grant new insight into God.  Thanks for choosing insight even in the face of disagreeable elements in Bell&#039;s overview.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Peace,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Brad&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Christian, for a synopsis of this important commentator in today&#39;s theological melting pot.  Your &#8220;What to do&#8221; section actually reflects what I like least about theological discussion with the typical Christian, only in that you address two camps of thought.  Fortunately yours two camps are not &#8220;for&#8221; and &#8220;against.&#8221;  When discussing a new theological idea, I often sense the listener targeting what he can verbally disagree with rather than what could potentially grant new insight into God.  Thanks for choosing insight even in the face of disagreeable elements in Bell&#39;s overview.<br /><br />Peace,<br /><br />Brad</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Tomlinson</title>
		<link>http://restlesspilgrim.com/2009/11/is-rob-bell-an-evangelical-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Tomlinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 23:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://restlesspilgrim.com/?p=1768#comment-531</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Appreciate the thorough and fair analysis, Christian...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appreciate the thorough and fair analysis, Christian&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
